Why Turkey Excels in Coronavirus Testing and Healthcare: A Comparative Analysis with the UK
The global pandemic has highlighted the disparities in healthcare systems around the world. One stark example is the comparison between Turkey and the United Kingdom regarding coronavirus (COVID-19) testing and healthcare measures. While the UK has faced significant challenges, Turkey has demonstrated a more robust and equitable approach to both testing and patient care.
Turkey's Commitment to Universal Healthcare
In Turkey, regardless of whether a patient possesses government health coverage or not, all corona patients will be admitted and treated without charge. This policy ensures that no one is left behind and that healthcare is available to all. For instance, the new treatment with plasma transfusion is free in Turkey, whereas in the UK and some EU countries, it can cost between 20,000 to 30,000 euros.
Moreover, the Turkish government has taken significant steps to ensure the public's health safety by providing free masks. Public transportation systems in Turkey also distribute these masks freely and require their use, which is a compulsory measure. In contrast, the UK has faced criticism for its inadequate mask supply, including the dearth of masks among healthcare workers who must wash and sterilize them repeatedly for reuse.
International Aid and Support
Turkey has also been proactive in offering assistance to the UK during the pandemic. For instance, Turkey has donated 14 tons of medical aid to the UK, supporting the country's efforts in battling the virus. A socially conscious writer reported on this donation, highlighting Turkey's willingness to help its neighbors in need.
Evaluation of Healthcare Quality
The World Health Organisation (WHO) ranks countries based on healthcare quality. According to the latest rankings, Spain is listed as the 7th best in the world, the UK is ranked 16th, and Turkey is ranked 70th. This ranking might seem concerning at first glance, but it's important to consider several factors:
Testing Frequency and Scope: The UK has focused on testing only those who have developed serious symptoms, potentially missing many asymptomatic cases. This approach can lead to undetected spread of the virus. Appropriate Measures: The key to reducing the spread of the virus is not just about the quality of healthcare but also about implementing effective public health measures. This is where the UK has faced criticism for its handling of the pandemic.Ahmet Y?ld?r?m, a health expert, points out that the UK was among the most prepared countries according to WHO assessments, yet they unfortunately had a 0 recovery rate during a particular period. This stark outcome raises questions about the effectiveness of their pandemic response.
Conclusion: Equating Testing with Healthcare Quality
It is misleading to assume that increased testing necessarily reflects the quality of a country's healthcare system. Testing is crucial for tracking the virus's spread, but it is only one piece of the puzzle. Lockdowns and other public health measures play a significant role in preventing the spread of the virus and protecting the most vulnerable populations.
While the United States often boasts about its healthcare system, it is important to note that their approach to healthcare, which emphasizes private insurance and high costs, may not always prioritize the needs of every citizen. In contrast, countries like Turkey are demonstrating that a robust healthcare system can be inclusive and effective, even in the face of a global pandemic.
The key takeaway is that the success of a healthcare system in responding to a crisis like the pandemic is not solely determined by testing numbers. It is about the overall effectiveness of measures designed to protect public health, prevent the spread of the virus, and ensure that everyone, including healthcare workers, has access to necessary resources.